Category Archives: Featured Articles

17 Reasons Why A Vote For Mitt Romney Is A Vote For The New World Order

Once again, the Republican Party is being tempted to vote for “the lesser of two evils”. A lot of Republicans are actually considering voting for Mitt Romney because they have bought the lie that he has “the best chance” of defeating Barack Obama in 2012. But just because he is the Republican candidate that is most like Barack Obama does not mean that he has the best chance of defeating him. The truth is that no self-respecting Republican should ever vote for Mitt Romney. A vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for the New World Order. Romney comes from the financial establishment, he is being showered with money from the financial establishment and he supports all of the goals of the financial establishment. This year, millions upon millions of dollars are being funneled into Romney’s campaign and into pro-Romney organizations. The New World Order is literally trying to buy the 2012 election for their dream candidate. Romney would be the ultimate Wall Street puppet, and if you cast a vote for Mitt Romney you are playing right into the hands of the financial elite.

If you do not believe that a vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for the New World Order, just consider Mitt Romney’s positions on the issues….

#1 The Federal Reserve

To the financial elite, there is no more important financial institution in the United States than the Federal Reserve, and Mitt Romney is a huge supporter of the Federal Reserve.

During one Republican debate, Romney actually tried to explain to all of us why “we need to have a Fed“.

Not only that, Mitt Romney has stated that he is not really concerned about what is going on over at the Federal Reserve. Mitt Romney has publicly stated that he is “not going to take my effort and focus on the Federal Reserve“.

That kind of talk is music to the ears of the financial elite.

Also, Romney fully supported the reappointment of Ben Bernanke as the Chairman of the Federal Reserve despite his absolutely horrific track record.

#2 Money From The Bankers

Mitt Romney is getting far, far, far more money from Wall Street bankers than any other Republican candidate.

In a recent article entitled “The Big Wall Street Banks Are Already Trying To Buy The 2012 Election“, I detailed how numbers compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show that Mitt Romney is getting more money from the employees of the “too big to fail” Wall Street banks than all of the other Republican candidates combined.
Continued on next page

Ron Paul Calls National Defense Authorization Act “Slip Into Tyranny”

“A dictator enjoys unrestrained power over the people. The legislative and judicial branches voluntarily cede this power or it’s taken by force. Most of the time, it’s given up easily, out of fear in time of war and civil disturbances, and with support from the people, although the dictator will also accumulate more power with the use of force.” Those prescient words of Republican presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) are taken from his book Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom.

The tyrannical assumption of power by the President and the cession of unheralded power to him by the Congress has taken place precisely as Dr. Paul warned.

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is an unprecedented, unconstitutional, and unchecked grant of dictatorial power to the President in the name of protecting the security of “the homeland.” Ron Paul described the bill (soon to be signed into law by the President) as a “slip into tyranny,” one that will almost certainly accelerate “our descent into totalitarianism.”

What of the NDAA? Are there indeed provisions contained therein that so ferociously tear at the constitutional fabric of our Republic?

In a word — yes.

This liberty-extinguishing legislation converts America into a war zone and turns Americans into potential suspected terrorists, complete with the full roster of rights typically afforded to terrorists — none.

A key component of this reconciled bill mandates a frightening grant of immense and unconstitutional power to the executive branch. Under the provisions of Section 1021, the President is afforded the absolute power to arrest and detain citizens of the United States without their being informed of any criminal charges, without a trial on the merits of those charges, and without a scintilla of the due process safeguards protected by the Constitution of the United States.

Further, in order to execute the provisions of Section 1021 described in the previous paragraph, subsequent clauses (Section 1022, for example) unlawfully give the President the absolute and unquestionable authority to deploy the armed forces of the United States to apprehend and to indefinitely detain those suspected of threatening the security of the “homeland.” In the language of this legislation, these people are called “covered persons.”

The universe of potential “covered persons” includes every citizen of the United States of America. Any American could one day find himself or herself branded a “belligerent” and thus subject to the complete confiscation of his or her constitutional civil liberties and nearly never-ending incarceration in a military prison.

In his assessment of the danger inherent in such acts, Paul is in good company. This suspension of habeas corpus, a right central to Anglo-American freedom from despotism for over 500 years, was described by Alexander Hamilton as one of “the favorite and most formidable instruments of tyranny.”

Congressman Paul eloquently expressed his assessment of such an assault on liberty:

The president’s widely expanded view of his own authority to detain Americans indefinitely even on American soil is for the first time in this legislation codified in law. That should chill all of us to our cores.

As reported by The Hill, in a phone message to supporters, Paul cited the Founders and their intent to bequeath to their descendants a government fettered in such a way as to threaten as little as possible man’s innate freedom:

The founders wanted to set a high bar for the government to overcome in order to deprive an individual of life or liberty. To lower that bar is to endanger everyone. When the bar is low enough to include political enemies, our descent into totalitarianism is virtually assured. The Patriot Act, as bad as its violation against the Fourth Amendment was, was just one step down the slippery slope. The recently passed National Defense Authorization Act continues that slip into tyranny, and in fact, accelerates it significantly.

Adding insult to injury, Congress has stuffed the bill full of funding for illegal and unconstitutional foreign wars so that the American people will pay over $670 billion dollars for the privilege of being deprived of their God-given rights and for the building of the American empire.

This appalling story doesn’t end there, however. The NDAA’s rap sheet of crimes against the Constitution is long. As Congressman Paul explained:

Continued on next page

The NDAA: Great Losses, Small Gains

by Becky Akers

The old chestnut has it that there is seldom any great loss without some small gain.

We’ve lost the incalculably precious, ancient right to habeas corpus with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2012; the bill has passed both houses of Congress and awaits only Obama’s signature to become law. If he endorses the bill as promised, he’ll legalize a wholly unconstitutional horror: The President may declare anyone a “terrorist” without presenting a scintilla of evidence. Nor is his victim any longer entitled to a trial.

We’ll also lose our republic-turned-democracy. The NDAA pushes it into the final stages of tyranny, a military dictatorship, by empowering the U.S. armed forces to arrest and “detain indefinitely” those denounced as terrorists. In effect, Our Rulers have declared war on us.

But here’s the gain: We’ll soon be rid of Congress as well as that corrupt occupant of the White House! The cretins and cowards who so blithely signed away our liberty will in reality be among the NDAA’s first casualties. Military dictators usually don’t tolerate civilian leadership for long.

Among the many scenarios: Obama declares Congressional Republicans “terrorists,” and the military imprisons them, for opposing his nationalization of medical insurance. He then moves on to Democrats; as any historian can verify, the totalitarian State feeds on its own. Politicians in favor one moment are wearing stripes or facing the firing squad the next as “purges” supersede elections.

Here’s an even likelier scenario. The commanders of the military’s various branches whom the NDAA has newly empowered realize what so many taxpayers and martial men before them have: Politicians are at best a nuisance and at worst a dire threat. Ergo, they capture the District of Criminals and either openly execute Obama or announce that he has committed suicide. The wusses in Congress who couldn’t withstand socialism’s siren call turn to jelly as they confront the warriors they have unleashed on the world for the first time. Most of them flee; the handful who refuse to believe their gravy train has ended — ironically, via their own legislation — cower in their offices. The troops have as much fun with them as they did the helpless prisoners at Abu Ghraib.

Once the generals have eliminated the politicians, they’ll start on one another. After all, tyrants by definition don’t share power.

Alas, the victor will then send his forces after us.

Which brings us to the second small gain our overwhelming losses have yielded. More Americans are waking up to the State’s fatal dangers. With the NDAA, politicians have graphically proved their utter contempt for the Constitution, liberty, and us — and their constituents have noticed. Citizens are finally beginning to recognize government for their worst enemy rather than their benevolent Big Brother. And they are arming themselves.

Therein lies the crucial difference between America and the other regimes that have plunged into this abyss: Residents of the latter could not forcefully defend themselves. But Americans can.

The question is whether they will.

Their record so far is not encouraging. A police-state already thrives at American airports, with some of its goons openly bragging that they “can do whatever [they] want.” With or without that warning, the TSA has de facto suspended much of the Bill of Rights: passengers may not joke about the B-word, though the First Amendment forbids Congress (the only legislative body the Constitution recognizes, even if we re-name the legislators “bureaucrats” and their laws “regulations”) from “abridging the freedom of speech”; travelers must submit to minute inspection of their persons and property without the warrant “supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” that the Fourth Amendment requires.

Yet passengers continue queuing up despite a decade of such despotism. Even when the unconstitutional searches descended into outright sexual assault last year, most Americans continued flying. Worse, many parents forced their children to submit to the TSA’s pedophilia. Here and there, a few aimed a camera at the crime, as if families so negligent of their children’s welfare could somehow redeem themselves by sharing the outrage on YouTube.

Meanwhile, the same fools who believe government when it claims that sexual molestation protects aviation will probably swallow its smears of dissidents as “terrorists.” But surviving the impending apocalypse requires that we stick together against those in power. We must see them as they are — as liars and sociopaths — and reject their opinions on everything. Indeed, what they denounce, we should value; what they deem good, we must despise.

Or, in Thomas Jefferson’s words, “when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce [a people] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government.”