Category Archives: Obama

New Ad Compares North Koreans to U.S. Union Members, Saying Neither Can ‘Change the System’

(theblaze.com – Tiffany Gabbay)
According to a recent ad released by the Center for Union Facts, citizens of North Korea are much like American union members in that neither are open to real change.

Fox News Insider reports:

Rick Berman, from the Center of Union Facts, joined Your World to defend the new ads and talked about the great responses they’ve gotten. He said, “It’s designed to tell people that if you live in North Korea, you can’t change the system that you’re living under. And if you’re in a workplace, you can’t change that system either if the union got voted in during the 1940s or the 50s or the 60s.”

Berman concluded, “They are taking a bad situation and making it worse for the average American worker and the president knows exactly what he is doing, he has created the most pro-union National Labor Relations Board in the history of the National Labor Relations Act.”

NDAA Is A Hoax: You Can’t Legalize Tyranny

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void.” -Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison.
(Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones – Infowars.com) President Obama quietly waited weeks to sign the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) legislation on New Year’s Eve after publicly threatening to veto the bill that, among other things, authorizes the indefinite detention of American citizens.

Obama’s signing statement tries to reassure observers that he wouldn’t use the “law” to detain citizens, but that is an illusion; his signing statement is meaningless, and the establishment occupying Washington have pulled a hoax on The People in violation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights to enslave them.

But you can’t legalize tyranny. One of the nation’s most well known legal precedents, Marbury vs. Madison, decided in 1803, makes clear that any “law” that is “repugnant to the Constitution is null and void.”

The blatant unconstitutional powers enacted in the legislature and executive branch is backfiring, however. This crowning act of tyranny is awakening people to the true intentions of Big Government in its takeover. The NDAA is so openly in violation of the American way, that Obama had to play lip-service to it in his signing statement language, even as he gave it the power of law.

Critics in the ACLU– by recognizing that Obama’s endorsement for NDAA will “damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law”– and the Human Rights Watch– in calling the bill’s passage a “historic tragedy for rights”– have abandoned their comfort zones and attacked the president from the left for crossing the Rubicon on rights, as they rightly should. Now is the time for more to join that call; for Americans of all stripes to speak out against so-called “laws” that enable the blatant political targeting of dissidents and declare a war against the citizens of this country.

Make no mistake, if we sit idly by and let this precedent become accepted– like the Patriot Act, with the appearance of law– more and more unconstitutional legislation will obviously take hold.

Court to hear Obama eligibility challenge on merits, first time

(RenewAmerica.com – Arlen Williams) “This will be the first time ever, since this whole thing began, that it will be looked on, on merit.” Those are the words of Carl Swensson, Republican Party Chairman of Clayton County, Georgia. “This” refers to an actual judicial hearing of the case against the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. to be, according to the United States Constitution, “Commander in Chief” and United States President.

The attorneys of Barack Obama requested a pretrial dismissal, as it had done on so many other occasions, against so many other cases. But yesterday, one judge denied and scheduled an official hearing of the case to commence, January 26.


From 2008 to the present, judicial standing has been refused the plaintiff, often via convoluted rationale, many say sophistry. The question however is elementary to our constitutional republic: can we as Citizens be assured those presented to us for our votes are eligible to hold office?

Read more »